Export limit exceeded: 15396 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (15396 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-96311 | 1 Microsoft | 27 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 24 more | 2026-10-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| Improper authorization in Windows Network List Service allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106098 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Wp Data Access | 2026-10-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| The WP Data Access WordPress plugin before 5.5.77 does not correctly check authorization on one of its application REST endpoints, verifying only read permission before performing a write, which allows unauthenticated attackers to modify data in an application exposed for anonymous read access even when update actions have been disabled by the administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109119 | 1 Ikus-soft | 1 Rdiffweb | 2026-10-17 | 8.8 High |
| Improper Privilege Management in the user management API endpoint (/api/users/{username_or_id}) in Rdiffweb allows authenticated users to elevate their privileges to administrator by modifying the role parameter in a POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108388 | 1 Indico | 1 Indico | 2026-10-17 | 3.5 Low |
| Indico is a feature-rich event management system. Indico 3.3.3 through 3.3.13 incorrectly uses the ambient web-session user instead of the user supplied to Contribution.can_manage when checking inherited event contribution-management permission. A low-privileged user can induce a privileged user to request a crafted legacy contribution export and cause speaker or author email addresses and contribution access-control entries to be stored in an API cache entry retrievable with less privilege. This issue was fixed in Indico 3.3.14. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107795 | 1 Tp-link | 1 Omada Software Controller | 2026-10-17 | N/A |
| Omada Controller's MSP and OpenAPI certificate/private-key management APIs do not properly enforce administrative authorization, allowing an authenticated user to perform privileged certificate management operations. Successful exploitation may allow a low-privileged authenticated user to upload or delete the controller's TLS certificate or private key, potentially disrupting secure management access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105898 | 1 Adobe | 2 Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-10-17 | 8.2 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110216 | 1 Youlai | 1 Youlai-boot | 2026-10-17 | 7.1 High |
| youlai-boot through 2.21.1 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to enable or disable accounts because the updateUserStatus handler lacks a @PreAuthorize check. Attackers can send PATCH requests to /api/v1/users/{userId}/status to disable root or admin accounts, locking administrators out, or re-enable accounts an administrator has disabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106090 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-10-17 | 8.8 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106614 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-10-17 | 7.8 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108123 | 2026-10-17 | 7.5 High | ||
| The WP Booking System – Booking Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.0.3 This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to read the stored notification email body of any booking by iterating booking_id and email_log_id, exposing customer PII including names, email addresses, phone numbers, messages, and booking dates intended to be visible only to administrators. This is exploitable by any Subscriber-level user because admin_init fires on profile.php, a wp-admin page accessible to all authenticated users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109369 | 2026-10-17 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| The WP Booking System – Booking Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.0.3 This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to grant themselves and arbitrary other users edit access to every booking form on the site by overwriting the user_permission meta that governs the plugin's own access-control list. Exploitation requires the attacker to have already been delegated edit rights on at least one booking form, as this delegation both downgrades the submenu capability to 'read' (making the edit page accessible) and allows them to harvest a valid wpbs_edit_form nonce that will pass validation against any other form_id. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109368 | 2026-10-17 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| The WP Booking System – Booking Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.0.3 via the 'id' parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to extract private per-event booking descriptions and booking IDs from any calendar managed by the site. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107763 | 2026-10-17 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Fastcache by Host.it plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.5. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to add or remove the plugin's page-cache rewrite rules in the site's root .htaccess file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96926 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows Server 2012 and 11 more | 2026-10-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| Missing authorization in DNS Server allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102682 | 1 Pipecat-ai | 1 Pipecat | 2026-10-17 | 5.6 Medium |
| Pipecat is an open-source Python framework for building real-time voice and multimodal conversational agents. From 0.0.98 until 1.6.0, the pipecat-ai package's built-in development runner exposes unauthenticated endpoints including /start, /daily, and /daily-dialin-webhook that can create bot sessions and Daily rooms. The runner binds to localhost by default and is intended only for local development, so exploitation requires an operator to expose it to untrusted traffic through --host 0.0.0.0, a published port, or a tunnel without access controls. An unauthenticated caller can consume local resources and third-party quotas and, depending on configuration, receive a room URL and join token. Version 1.6.0 adds a prominent development-runner banner and documentation that clarifies the unauthenticated boundary and directs production deployments to an authenticated dispatcher or managed runtime, while the endpoint behavior remains by design. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106623 | 1 Adobe | 1 Coldfusion | 2026-10-17 | 7.5 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56826 | 2026-10-17 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. From 2.0.0 until 2.9.2, authenticated users who could reach the Settings pages with only access_setting could directly invoke destructive actions through the Livewire endpoint because packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Settings/Zones/ZoneShippingOptions.php, packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Settings/Zones/Detail.php, packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Settings/Taxes/Detail.php, and packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Settings/Taxes/TaxRates.php did not enforce server-side delete authorization. The actions could delete carrier options, shipping zones, tax zones, and tax rates, disrupting checkout shipping, payment-method mapping, and tax calculation. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110112 | 1 Finsys | 1 Dockhand | 2026-10-17 | 8.1 High |
| Dockhand before 1.0.50 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows users from another tenant to gain admin access because OIDC iss, aud, nonce and exp claims are not validated. Attackers with admin rights in another tenant of a shared provider like Microsoft Entra ID can recreate the mapped admin group and log in as Dockhand administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110123 | 1 Maku | 1 Maku-boot | 2026-10-16 | 7.1 High |
| Makunet maku-boot 4.3.0 through 5.0.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated users to read mail and SMS configurations by calling /sys/mail/config/list and /sys/sms/config/list without the required authority checks. Attackers can retrieve unmasked SMTP passwords and Aliyun, Tencent Cloud, Qiniu or Huawei Cloud access keys, and abuse /sys/mail/config/send to send mail to arbitrary recipients. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106700 | 2026-10-16 | 8.8 High | ||
| ELADMIN v2.7 and earlier contains an improper access control vulnerability in the user-management endpoint PUT /api/users/resetPwd of me.zhengjie.modules.system.rest.UserController. The method lacks the method-level authorization check applied to all other user-management endpoints and performs no role-level or ownership validation in UserServiceImpl.resetPwd. Any authenticated user of any role can reset the password of arbitrary users, including the built-in administrator. | ||||