| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Buffer overflow in HP Radia Notify Daemon 3.1.0.0 (formerly by Novadigm), and other versions including 2.x, 3.x, and 4.x, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long file extension. |
| Unknown vulnerability in HP-UX B.11.00, B.11.04, B.11.11, B.11.22, and B.11.23, when running TCP/IP on IPv4, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via certain packets, related to the PMTU, a different vulnerability than CVE-2004-1060. |
| The web interface server in HP Web JetAdmin 5.6 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) attack. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in CDE dtmailpr of HP Tru64 4.0F through 5.1B allows local users to gain privileges via unknown attack vectors. NOTE: due to lack of details in the vendor advisory, it is not clear whether this is the same issue as CVE-1999-0840. |
| Java Runtime Environment (JRE) Bytecode Verifier allows remote attackers to escape the Java sandbox and execute commands via an applet containing an illegal cast operation, as seen in (1) Microsoft VM build 3802 and earlier as used in Internet Explorer 4.x and 5.x, (2) Netscape 6.2.1 and earlier, and possibly other implementations that use vulnerable versions of SDK or JDK, aka a variant of the "Virtual Machine Verifier" vulnerability. |
| The NSAPI plugins for TGA and the Java Servlet proxy in HP-UX VVOS 10.24 and 11.04 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service (high CPU utilization). |
| Buffer overflow in quot in HP Tru64 UNIX 5.1a, 5.1, 5.0a, 4.0g, and 4.0f allows local users to gain privileges. |
| HP-UX vgdisplay program gives root access to local users. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) implementation in HP HP-UX B.11.00, B.11.11, and B.11.23 running IPSec, HP Jetdirect 635n IPv6/IPsec Print Server, and HP Tru64 UNIX 5.1B-3 and 5.1B-2/PK4, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service via certain IKE packets, as demonstrated by the PROTOS ISAKMP Test Suite for IKEv1. NOTE: due to the lack of details in the HP advisory, it is unclear which of CVE-2005-3666, CVE-2005-3667, and/or CVE-2005-3668 this issue applies to. |
| Multiple shell programs on various Unix systems, including (1) tcsh, (2) csh, (3) sh, and (4) bash, follow symlinks when processing << redirects (aka here-documents or in-here documents), which allows local users to overwrite files of other users via a symlink attack. |
| Buffer overflow in dtprintinfo on HP-UX 11.00, and possibly other operating systems, allows local users to gain root privileges via a long DISPLAY environment variable. |
| Buffer overflow in the Telnet service in HP JetDirect printer card Firmware x.08.20 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service. |
| Unknown vulnerability in ping in HP Tru64 UNIX 5.1a, 5.1, 5.0a, 4.0g, and 4.0f allows local users to cause a denial of service. |
| Vulnerability in OmniBackII A.03.50 in HP 11.x and earlier allows attackers to gain unauthorized access to an OmniBack client. |
| HP VirtualVault with the PHSS_17692 patch allows unprivileged processes to bypass access restrictions via the Trusted Gateway Proxy (TGP). |
| Certain files in MPower in HP-UX 10.x are installed with insecure permissions, which allows local users to gain privileges. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the LP subsystem in HP-UX B.11.00, B.11.04, B.11.11, and B.11.23 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unknown vectors. |
| OpenSSL 0.9.6 before 0.9.6d does not properly handle unknown message types, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), as demonstrated using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in HP-UX B.11.00, B.11.11 and B.11.23, when running in trusted mode, allows local users to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle for OpenView (OfO) 8.1.7, 9.1.01, and 9.2, and OfO for Linux, allow remote attackers to have an unknown impact via unknown attack vectors. NOTE: because of the lack of details in the vendor advisory, it is unclear which set of existing CVEs this advisory might refer to. |
