Export limit exceeded: 29820 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11605 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-21508 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Versions of the package mysql2 before 3.9.4 are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via the readCodeFor function due to improper validation of the supportBigNumbers and bigNumberStrings values. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13984 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| QiAnXin TianQing Management Center versions up to and including 6.7.0.4130 contain a path traversal vulnerability in the rptsvr component that allows unauthenticated attackers to upload files to arbitrary locations on the server. The /rptsvr/upload endpoint fails to sanitize the filename parameter in multipart form-data requests, enabling path traversal. This allows attackers to place executable files in web-accessible directories, potentially leading to remote code execution. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-08-23 UTC. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25581 | 1 Pac4j | 1 Pac4j | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| pac4j is a security framework for Java. `pac4j-core` prior to version 4.0.0 is affected by a Java deserialization vulnerability. The vulnerability affects systems that store externally controlled values in attributes of the `UserProfile` class from pac4j-core. It can be exploited by providing an attribute that contains a serialized Java object with a special prefix `{#sb64}` and Base64 encoding. This issue may lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the worst case. Although a `RestrictedObjectInputStream` is in place, that puts some restriction on what classes can be deserialized, it still allows a broad range of java packages and potentially exploitable with different gadget chains. pac4j versions 4.0.0 and greater are not affected by this issue. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12066 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The SMSA Shipping(official) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the smsa_delete_label() function in all versions up to, and including, 2.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can easily lead to remote code execution when the right file is deleted (such as wp-config.php). CVE-2024-49249 is likely a duplicate of this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5310 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Dover Fueling Solutions ProGauge MagLink LX Consoles expose an undocumented and unauthenticated target communication framework (TCF) interface on a specific port. Files can be created, deleted, or modified, potentially leading to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21885 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in X.Org server. In the XISendDeviceHierarchyEvent function, it is possible to exceed the allocated array length when certain new device IDs are added to the xXIHierarchyInfo struct. This can trigger a heap buffer overflow condition, which may lead to an application crash or remote code execution in SSH X11 forwarding environments. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47292 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Cap Collectif is an online decision making platform that integrates several tools. Before commit 812f2a7d271b76deab1175bdaf2be0b8102dd198, the `DebateAlternateArgumentsResolver` deserializes a `Cursor`, allowing any classes and which can be controlled by unauthenticated user. Exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to Remote Code Execution. The vulnerability is fixed in commit 812f2a7d271b76deab1175bdaf2be0b8102dd198. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9951 | 1 Ffmpeg | 1 Ffmpeg | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A heap-buffer-overflow write exists in jpeg2000dec FFmpeg which allows an attacker to potentially gain remote code execution or cause denial of service via the channel definition cdef atom of JPEG2000. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54317 | 1 Logpoint | 1 Logpoint | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.6.0. An attacker with operator privileges can exploit a path traversal vulnerability when creating a Layout Template, which can lead to remote code execution (RCE). | ||||
| CVE-2024-33898 | 1 Axiros | 1 Axess | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Axiros AXESS Auto Configuration Server (ACS) 4.x and 5.0.0 is affected by an Incorrect Access Control vulnerability. An authorization bypass allows remote attackers to achieve unauthenticated remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13990 | 1 Microworld Technologies | 1 Escan | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| MicroWorld eScan AV's update mechanism failed to ensure authenticity and integrity of updates: update packages were delivered and accepted without robust cryptographic verification. As a result, an on-path attacker could perform a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack and substitute malicious update payloads for legitimate ones. The eScan AV client accepted these substituted packages and executed or loaded their components (including sideloaded DLLs and Java/installer payloads), enabling remote code execution on affected systems. MicroWorld eScan confirmed remediation of the update mechanism on 2023-07-31 but versioning details are unavailable. NOTE: MicroWorld eScan disputes the characterization in third-party reports, stating the issue relates to 2018–2019 and that controls were implemented then. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36877 | 1 Request | 1 Serious Play Pro | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| ReQuest Serious Play F3 Media Server 7.0.3 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands as the web server user. Attackers can upload PHP executable files via the Quick File Uploader page, resulting in remote code execution on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12035 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The CS Framework plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the cs_widget_file_delete() function in all versions up to, and including, 6.9. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can easily lead to remote code execution when the right file is deleted (such as wp-config.php). | ||||
| CVE-2020-37043 | 2 10-strike, Nsasoft | 2 Bandwidth Monitor, Network Bandwidth Monitor | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| 10-Strike Bandwidth Monitor 3.9 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows attackers to bypass SafeSEH, ASLR, and DEP protections through carefully crafted input. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by sending a malicious payload to the application's registration key input, enabling remote code execution and launching arbitrary system commands. | ||||
| CVE-2014-125119 | 1 Rarlab | 1 Winrar | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A filename spoofing vulnerability exists in WinRAR when opening specially crafted ZIP archives. The issue arises due to inconsistencies between the Central Directory and Local File Header entries in ZIP files. When viewed in WinRAR, the file name from the Central Directory is displayed to the user, while the file from the Local File Header is extracted and executed. An attacker can leverage this flaw to spoof filenames and trick users into executing malicious payloads under the guise of harmless files, potentially leading to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37050 | 1 M.j.m | 1 Quick Player | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Quick Player 1.3 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by crafting a malicious .m3l file with carefully constructed payload. Attackers can trigger the vulnerability by loading a specially crafted file through the application's file loading mechanism, potentially enabling remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6885 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| The MaxiBlocks: 2200+ Patterns, 190 Pages, 14.2K Icons & 100 Styles plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the maxi_remove_custom_image_size and maxi_add_custom_image_size functions in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can easily lead to remote code execution when the right file is deleted (such as wp-config.php). | ||||
| CVE-2024-43663 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| There are many buffer overflow vulnerabilities present in several CGI binaries of the charging station.This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC model chargers beforeversion 24120701. Likelihood: High – Given the prevalence of these buffer overflows, and the clear error message of the web server, an attacker is very likely to be able to find these vulnerabilities. Impact: Low – Usually, overflowing one of these buffers just causes a segmentation fault of the CGI binary, which causes the web server to return a 502 Bad Gateway error. However the webserver itself is not affected, and no DoS can be achieved. Abusing these buffer overflows in a meaningful way requires highly technical knowledge, especially since ASLR also seems to be enabled on the charging station. However, a skilled attacker might be able to use one of these buffer overflows to obtain remote code execution. CVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack has a small impact on the availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:L). There is no impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). While this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not expect this vulnerability to have a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). | ||||
| CVE-2025-7769 | 1 Tigo Energy | 1 Cloud Connect Advanced | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Tigo Energy's CCA is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the /cgi-bin/mobile_api endpoint when the DEVICE_PING command is called, allowing remote code execution due to improper handling of user input. When used with default credentials, this enables attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the device that could cause potential unauthorized access, service disruption, and data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43648 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Command injection in the <redacted> parameter of a <redacted>.exe request leads to remote code execution as the root user. This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701. Likelihood: Moderate – This action is not a common place for command injection vulnerabilities to occur. Thus, an attacker will likely only be able to find this vulnerability by reverse-engineering the firmware or trying it on all <redacted> fields. The attacker will also need a (low privilege) account to gain access to the <redacted> binary, or convince a user with such access to execute a payload. Impact: Critical – The attacker has full control over the charging station as the root user, and can arbitrarily add, modify and delete files and services. CVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). If is a full system compromise, potentially fully compromising confidentiality, integrity and availability of the devicer (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H). A compromised charger can be used to "pivot" onto networks that should otherwise be closed, cause a low confidentiality and interity impact on subsequent systems. (SC:L/SI:L/SA:H). Because this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we suspect this vulnerability can have a safety impact (S:P). The attack can be automated (AU:Y). | ||||