Search Results (1349 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-13803 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-08-02 8.3 High
Type Confusion in Chrome Tabs in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-13967 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-08-02 8.8 High
Heap buffer overflow in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
CVE-2026-67338 1 Jupyter 1 Jupyterlab 2026-08-01 6.1 Medium
JupyterLab before 4.5.9 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Extension Manager that fails to validate URI protocols in package metadata URLs. Attackers can publish malicious PyPI packages with javascript: URLs in project metadata that execute arbitrary JavaScript in the JupyterLab origin when users click the extension name.
CVE-2026-58558 1 Huawei 2 Emui, Harmonyos 2026-08-01 7.8 High
Permission control vulnerability in the file system. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.
CVE-2026-16420 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-08-01 8.8 High
Type Confusion in WebAudio in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.182 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-64693 1 Apple 5 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Tvos and 2 more 2026-08-01 5.5 Medium
A type confusion issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.6 and iPadOS 26.6, macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.6, tvOS 26.6, visionOS 26.6, watchOS 26.6. Processing a maliciously crafted image may lead to a denial-of-service.
CVE-2026-17687 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-07-31 9.6 Critical
Type Confusion in ANGLE in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-14423 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-07-31 9.6 Critical
Type Confusion in Tint in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-14431 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-07-31 8.8 High
Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-58305 1 Samsung Open Source 1 Escargot 2026-07-31 6.1 Medium
Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') vulnerability in Samsung Open Source Escargot allows Pointer Manipulation. This issue affects Escargot: before 779f6bedf58f334dec64b0a51ebb724b4708b84a.
CVE-2026-17948 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-07-31 7.5 High
Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Low)
CVE-2026-17989 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-07-31 8.8 High
Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
CVE-2026-17866 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-07-30 5.8 Medium
Type Confusion in Tab in Google Chrome on Android prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
CVE-2026-16392 1 Mozilla 1 Firefox 2026-07-30 9.1 Critical
JIT miscompilation in the JavaScript Engine: JIT component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 153 and Thunderbird 153.
CVE-2026-17725 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-07-30 8.8 High
Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-17697 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-07-30 9.6 Critical
Type Confusion in ANGLE in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-13776 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-07-29 9.6 Critical
Type Confusion in Dawn in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
CVE-2026-6210 2 Qt, The Qt Company 2 Qt, Qt 2026-07-29 6.5 Medium
A type confusion vulnerability in Qt SVG allows an attacker to cause an application crash via a crafted SVG image. When processing SVG marker references, the renderer retrieves a node by its id attribute and casts it to QSvgMarker* without verifying the node type. A non-marker element (such as a <line> element) that references itself as a marker triggers an out-of-bounds heap read due to the object size difference between QSvgLine and QSvgMarker, followed by an endless recursion that bypasses the marker recursion guard through incorrect virtual dispatch. The result is an application crash (denial of service). This issue affects Qt SVG:  from 6.7.0 before 6.8.8, from 6.9.0 before 6.11.1.
CVE-2026-16103 1 Redhat 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 4 more 2026-07-28 4.3 Medium
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak. This issue is an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-9798, where brute-force protection checks were added to the Client-Initiated Backchannel Authentication (CIBA) initiation handler but were omitted from the token redemption handler. This allows an attacker with valid client credentials to obtain access and refresh tokens for a user account that has been locked due to brute-force protection, provided the authentication request was started before the lockout occurred and was approved by the user.
CVE-2026-18029 1 Pretix Gmbh 1 Pretix-girosolution 2026-07-28 N/A
Our payment integration with GiroCheckout did not properly validate payment status responses. An attacker could use a successful payment status response from one payment and supply it to the system for a different payment, gaining access to multiple valid tickets with only one payment.