Export limit exceeded: 30000 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (4059 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-62155 | 1 Quantumnous | 1 New-api | 2026-04-15 | 8.5 High |
| New API is a large language mode (LLM) gateway and artificial intelligence (AI) asset management system. Prior to version 0.9.6, a recently patched SSRF vulnerability contains a bypass method that can bypass the existing security fix and still allow SSRF to occur. Because the existing fix only applies security restrictions to the first URL request, a 302 redirect can bypass existing security measures and successfully access the intranet. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40595 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Sma1000 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface. By using an encoded URL, a remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially cause the appliance to make requests to unintended location. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46385 | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High | ||
| CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | ||||
| CVE-2024-55082 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the endpoint http://{your-server}/url-to-pdf of Stirling-PDF 0.35.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8099 | 2 Duckdb, Vanna-ai | 2 Duckdb, Vanna | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the latest version of vanna-ai/vanna when using DuckDB as the database. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted SQL queries that leverage DuckDB's default features, such as `read_csv`, `read_csv_auto`, `read_text`, and `read_blob`, to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, internal systems, and potentially further attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12121 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Broken Link Checker | Finder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.0 via the 'moblc_check_link' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12801 | 2026-04-15 | 3.3 Low | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in SaxEventRecorder by QOS.CH logback version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and 1.4.0 to 1.5.12 on the Java platform, allows an attacker to forge requests by compromising logback configuration files in XML. The attacks involves the modification of DOCTYPE declaration in XML configuration files. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42965 | 2026-04-15 | 4.1 Medium | ||
| SAP CMC Promotion Management allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate internal network systems by submitting crafted requests during job source configuration. By analysing response times for various IP addresses and ports, the attacker can infer valid network endpoints. Successful exploitation may lead to information disclosure. This vulnerability does not impact the integrity or availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42182 | 2026-04-15 | 2.5 Low | ||
| BigFix Patch Download Plug-ins are affected by Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. It may allow the application to download files from an internally hosted server on localhost. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11674 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| SOOP-CLM developed by PiExtract has a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability, allowing privileged remote attackers to read server files or probe internal network information. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9821 | 1 Mautic | 1 Mautic | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low |
| SummaryUsers with webhook permissions can conduct SSRF via webhooks. If they have permission to view the webhook logs, the (partial) request response is also disclosed DetailsWhen sending webhooks, the destination is not validated, causing SSRF. ImpactBypass of firewalls to interact with internal services. See https://owasp.org/Top10/A10_2021-Server-Side_Request_Forgery_%28SSRF%29/ for more potential impact. Resources https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Server_Side_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html for more information on SSRF and its fix. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59344 | 1 Aliasvault | 1 Aliasvault | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High |
| AliasVault is a privacy-first password manager with built-in email aliasing. A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the favicon extraction feature of AliasVault API versions 0.23.0 and lower. The extractor fetches a user-supplied URL, parses the returned HTML, and follows <link rel="icon" href="…">. Although the initial URL is validated to allow only HTTP/HTTPS with default ports, the extractor automatically follows redirects and does not block requests to loopback or internal IP ranges. An authenticated, low-privileged user can exploit this behavior to coerce the backend into making HTTP(S) requests to arbitrary internal hosts and non-default ports. If the target host serves a favicon or any other valid image, the response is returned to the attacker in Base64 form. Even when no data is returned, timing and error behavior can be abused to map internal services. This vulnerability only affects self-hosted AliasVault instances that are reachable from the public internet with public user registration enabled. Private/internal deployments without public sign-ups are not directly exploitable. This issue has been fixed in AliasVault release 0.23.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25235 | 1 Omnissa | 1 Secure Email Gateway | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Omnissa Secure Email Gateway (SEG) in SEG prior to 2.32 running on Windows and SEG prior to 2503 running on UAG allows routing of network traffic such as HTTP requests to internal networks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40632 | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low | ||
| Linkerd is an open source, ultralight, security-first service mesh for Kubernetes. In affected versions when the application being run by linkerd is susceptible to SSRF, an attacker could potentially trigger a denial-of-service (DoS) attack by making requests to localhost:4191/shutdown. Linkerd could introduce an optional environment variable to control a token that must be passed as a header. Linkerd should reject shutdown requests that do not include this header. This issue has been addressed in release version edge-24.6.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34021 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR camera models, including iZero, Targa 512, Targa 504, Targa Semplice, Targa 704 TKM, Targa 805, Targa 710 INOX, Targa 750, and Targa 704 ILB. The application fails to validate user-supplied input in JSON POST parameters such as ipnotify_address and url, which are used by internal mechanisms to perform image fetch and DNS lookups. This allows remote unauthenticated attackers to induce the system to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external systems, potentially bypassing firewall policies or conducting internal service enumeration. Exploitation evidence was observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-01-25 UTC. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25738 | 1 Openlibraryfoundation | 1 Vufind | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /Upgrade/FixConfig route in Open Library Foundation VuFind 2.0 through 9.1 before 9.1.1 allows a remote attacker to overwrite local configuration files to gain access to the administrator panel and achieve Remote Code Execution. A mitigating factor is that it requires the allow_url_include PHP runtime setting to be on, which is off in default installations. It also requires the /Upgrade route to be exposed, which is exposed by default after installing VuFind, and is recommended to be disabled by setting autoConfigure to false in config.ini. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2663 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The ZD YouTube FLV Player plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6 via the $_GET['image'] parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40441 | 1 Doccano | 2 Auto Labeling Pipeline, Doccano | 2026-04-15 | 6.6 Medium |
| An issue in Doccano Open source annotation tools for machine learning practitioners v.1.8.4 and Doccano Auto Labeling Pipeline module to annotate a document automatically v.0.1.23 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the model_attribs parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5021 | 1 Nimble3 | 1 Wordpress Picture\/portfolio\/media Gallery | 2026-04-15 | 9.3 Critical |
| The WordPress Picture / Portfolio / Media Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 via the 'file_get_contents' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29415 | 2 Fedorindutny, Redhat | 2 Ip, Openshift Devspaces | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| The ip package through 2.0.1 for Node.js might allow SSRF because some IP addresses (such as 127.1, 01200034567, 012.1.2.3, 000:0:0000::01, and ::fFFf:127.0.0.1) are improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-42282. | ||||